RaDonda Vaught, a former nurse criminally prosecuted for a deadly drug error in 2017, was convicted of gross neglect of an impaired grownup and negligent murder Friday after a three-day trial that gripped nurses throughout the nation.
Vaught faces three to 6 years in jail for neglect and one to 2 years for negligent murder as a defendant with no prior convictions, based on sentencing pointers supplied by the Nashville district legal professional’s workplace. Vaught is scheduled to be sentenced Could 13, and her sentences are more likely to run concurrently, stated DA spokesperson Steve Hayslip.
Vaught was acquitted of reckless murder. Criminally negligent murder was a lesser cost included underneath reckless murder.
Vaught’s trial has been carefully watched by nurses and medical professionals throughout the nation, lots of whom fear it might set a precedent of criminalizing medical errors. Medical errors are usually dealt with by skilled licensing boards or civil courts, and legal prosecutions like Vaught’s case are exceedingly uncommon.
Janie Harvey Garner, the founding father of Present Me Your Stethoscope, a Fb nursing group with greater than 600,000 members, nervous the conviction would have a chilling impact on nurses disclosing their very own errors or near-errors, which might have a detrimental impact on the standard of affected person care.
“Well being care simply modified endlessly,” she stated after the decision. “You may now not belief folks to inform the reality as a result of they are going to be incriminating themselves.”
Vaught, 38, of Bethpage, Tennessee, was arrested in 2019 and charged with reckless murder and gross neglect of an impaired grownup in reference to the killing of Charlene Murphey, who died at Vanderbilt College Medical Middle in late December 2017. The neglect cost stemmed from allegations that Vaught didn’t correctly monitor Murphey after she was injected with the fallacious drug.
Murphey, 75, of Gallatin, Tennessee, was admitted to Vanderbilt for a mind damage. On the time of the error, her situation was enhancing, and she or he was being ready for discharge from the hospital, based on courtroom testimony and a federal investigation report. Murphey was prescribed a sedative, Versed, to calm her earlier than being scanned in a big, MRI-like machine.
Vaught was tasked to retrieve Versed from a computerized treatment cupboard however as a substitute grabbed a robust paralyzer, vecuronium. In keeping with an investigation report filed in her court docket case, the nurse neglected a number of warning indicators as she withdrew the fallacious drug — together with that Versed is a liquid however vecuronium is a powder — after which injected Murphey and left her to be scanned. By the point the error was found, Murphey was brain-dead.
In the course of the trial, prosecutors painted Vaught as an irresponsible and uncaring nurse who ignored her coaching and deserted her affected person. Assistant District Legal professional Chad Jackson likened Vaught to a drunken driver who killed a bystander, however stated the nurse was “worse” as a result of it was as if she was “driving with [her] eyes closed.”
“The immutable truth of this case is that Charlene Murphey is lifeless as a result of RaDonda Vaught couldn’t hassle to concentrate to what she was doing,” Jackson stated.
Vaught’s legal professional, Peter Strianse, argued that his shopper made an trustworthy mistake that didn’t represent against the law and have become a “scapegoat” for systemic issues associated to treatment cupboards at Vanderbilt College Medical Middle in 2017.
However Vanderbilt officers countered on the stand. Terry Bosen, Vanderbilt’s pharmacy treatment security officer, testified that the hospital had some technical issues with treatment cupboards in 2017 however that they have been resolved weeks earlier than Vaught pulled the fallacious drug for Murphey.
In his closing assertion, Strianse focused the reckless murder cost, arguing that his shopper couldn’t have “recklessly” disregarded warning indicators if she earnestly believed she had the suitable drug and saying that there was “appreciable debate” over whether or not vecuronium truly killed Murphey.
In the course of the trial, Dr. Eli Zimmerman, a Vanderbilt neurologist, testified it was “within the realm of chance” Murphey’s demise was prompted completely by her mind damage. Moreover, Davidson County Chief Medical Examiner Feng Li testified that though he decided Murphey died from vecuronium, he could not confirm how a lot of the drug she truly obtained. Li stated a small dose might not have been deadly.
“I do not imply to be facetious,” Strianse stated of the health worker’s testimony, “however it kind of seemed like some newbie ‘CSI’ episode — solely with out the science.”
Vaught didn’t testify. On the second day of the trial, prosecutors performed an audio recording of Vaught’s interview with regulation enforcement officers by which she admitted to the drug error and stated she “in all probability simply killed a affected person.”
Throughout a separate continuing earlier than the Tennessee Board of Nursing final 12 months, Vaught testified that she allowed herself to turn into “complacent” and “distracted” whereas utilizing the treatment cupboard and didn’t double-check which drug she had withdrawn regardless of a number of alternatives.
“I do know the rationale this affected person is now not right here is due to me,” Vaught instructed the nursing board, beginning to cry. “There gained’t ever be a day that goes by that I don’t take into consideration what I did.”
This text was reprinted from khn.org with permission from the Henry J. Kaiser Household Basis. Kaiser Well being Information, an editorially impartial information service, is a program of the Kaiser Household Basis, a nonpartisan well being care coverage analysis group unaffiliated with Kaiser Permanente.
#Nurse #convicted #neglect #negligent #murder #deadly #drug #error